-
The Journal of urology · May 1995
Comparative StudyComparison of bladder management complication outcomes in female spinal cord injury patients.
- C J Bennett, M N Young, R H Adkins, and F Diaz.
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
- J. Urol. 1995 May 1;153(5):1458-60.
AbstractA total of 70 female spinal cord injury patients was retrospectively analyzed for outcomes of long-term bladder management. Three groups were defined: 1) 23 patients on intermittent catheterization, 2) 25 treated by reflex voiding and incontinence padding, and 3) 22 with an indwelling catheter. Mean years of using the specific bladder management technique were 8.5 +/- 4.7, 15.8 +/- 7.3 and 16.7 +/- 9.0 for the 3 groups, respectively. All patients were evaluated for long-term complications. There were 4 major complications (17%) in the intermittent catheterization group, 10 (40%) in the padding group and 58 (greater than 200%) in the indwelling catheter group. The aggregate difference in complication rates among the 3 group was highly significant (p < 0.00001). Of comparable long-term patients (11 to 23 years) there were no major complications among 6 on intermittent catheterization, 8 among 14 who use padding and 21 among 9 with an indwelling catheter. The differences among the groups remained significant (p < 0.00001). Additional analyses showed highly significant differences between the catheter group and the other 2 groups (intermittent catheterization p = 0.0009 and padding p = 0.0005), and a difference that approached significance between the intermittent catheterization and padding groups (p = 0.085). The results strongly support intermittent catheterization as the optimal management of female patients following spinal cord injury given that other factors, in particular independent hand function or the need for appropriate assistance, are considered.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.