• Paolo Barone, David J Burn, Teus van Laar, Chuanchieh Hsu, Werner Poewe, and Roger M Lane.
• Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy. barone@unina.it
• Mov. Disord. 2008 Aug 15;23(11):1532-40.

AbstractThe effects of rivastigmine versus placebo in Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) patients with elevated or normal/low plasma homocysteine were determined. In this prospective analysis of a 24-week, randomly assigned, placebo-controlled study of rivastigmine in PDD, subpopulations comprised patients with plasma homocysteine >or=14 micromol/L (elevated) or <14 micromol/L (normal/low). Coprimary outcomes were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Society-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC). Secondary outcomes included additional measures of cognition, including attention and executive function, daily function, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. In total, 342 of 541 patients provided samples for analysis, from which 72% had elevated plasma homocysteine. Hyperhomocysteinemic patients showed treatment differences (rivastigmine vs. placebo) of 4.0 on ADAS-cog and 0.7 on ADCS-CGIC (both P < 0.01), and significant treatment differences on secondary outcomes. Rivastigmine- and placebo-treated hyperhomocysteinemic patients (16.5% and 14.6%) discontinued the study because of AEs. Patients with normal/low homocysteine showed no treatment differences on primary or secondary outcomes (1.4 on the ADAS-cog and 0.1 on ADCS-CGIC, both P = ns); 16.7% and 10.3% rivastigmine- and placebo-treated patients discontinued because of AEs. Elevated homocysteine was associated with greater rivastigmine treatment differences than normal/low homocysteine.(c) 2008 Movement Disorder Society.

29 keywords...

hide…