• Spine · Aug 2009

    Comparative Study

    Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.

    • Takahiro Tsutsumimoto, Mitsuhiko Shimogata, Hiroshi Ohta, and Hiromichi Misawa.
    • Spine Center, Yodakubo Hospital, Nagawa, 2857 Furumachi, Nagawa, Nagano, Japan. takatsutsumimoto@ybb.ne.jp
    • Spine. 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1923-8.

    Study DesignA comparative analysis of paraspinal muscle damage and radiographic parameters after mini-open and conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).ObjectiveTo determine whether mini-open PLIF decreases paraspinal muscle damage and yields the same radiographic results as those in conventional open PLIF.Summary Of Background DataCompared with conventional open PLIF, mini-open PLIF using a paramedian approach reduces intraoperative hemorrhage and decreases postoperative back pain. However, whether the latter produces less paraspinal muscle damage than the former remains unclear. No comparative study has investigated slip reduction and segmental lordosis at the fusion level in the 2 techniques.MethodsWe studied 20 patients (10 in each group) who had undergone single-level conventional (midline approach) or mini-open (bilateral Wiltse approach) PLIF with pedicle screws and interbody cages at the L4-L5 level for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The rate of improvement in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score; radiographic parameters, including %slip; segmental lordotic angle at the L4-L5 level; and fusion rate were examined. Postoperative multifidus (MF) atrophy and degeneration were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS.: No significant differences were detected between the 2 groups with respect to the rate of improvement in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, segmental lordotic angle, and fusion rate. Both groups showed significant reduction in %slip after surgery. The degree of MF atrophy and the increase in T2-signal intensity in the MF muscle after mini-open PLIF were significantly lesser than those following open PLIF.ConclusionMini-open PLIF is safe and effective. Mini-open PLIF was less invasive than open PLIF with regard to the MF muscle.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.