-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
[Evaluation of efficiency of ACD-CPR and STD-CPR; a multi-institutional study].
- T Arai, N Adachi, E Tabo, T Yorozuya, T Nagaro, G Ochi, A Sakurai, T Omote, Y Okada, T Nakagawa, M Katoh, M Shindoh, T Kaneko, H Nobuhara, M Nakane, H Morooka, and K Furuta.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime 791-0295. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ehime University Hospital, Ehime 791-0295.
- Masui. 2001 Mar 1;50(3):307-15.
AbstractWe compared the efficacy of ACD-CPR and STD-CPR based on 64 multi-institutional reports. No significant differences were observed in the rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in cardiopulmonary parameters during CPR using the two methods. There were 5 cases in which cardiopulmonary parameters improved after switching from STD-CPR to ACD-CPR and, eventually, in two of them spontaneous circulation was restored. In the ROSC cases of both groups, ETCO2 and values of SpO2, PaO2, and systolic BP at 30 minutes were higher than those of non-ROSC cases. ETCO2 never exceeded 20 mmHg in the non-ROSC cases, but it was higher in the ROSC cases. ACD-CPR is a good choice when trained persons are present or when extra hands are available to continue the CPR.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..