• Ginecol Obstet Mex · May 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Clinical efficacy of fluconazole, tinidazole and clindamycin vs fluconazole, tinidazole and azithromycin in the treatment of mixed cervical-vaginal infections, included those caused by Mycoplasma and Chlamydia trachomatis].

    • Jesús Roberto Villagrana-Zesati, Fernando M Guerra-Infante, and Irma Elena Sosa-González.
    • Departamento de Infectologia, Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia, México. dr_robertovillagrana@hotmail.com
    • Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013 May 1;81(5):231-8.

    BackgroundIn the United States 19 million people acquire a sexually transmitted disease every year. Sexually transmitted diseases impact in gynecological terms because they may cause sterility, infertility and ectopic pregnancy.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of two combinations of three oral antimicrobial drugs in the treatment of mixed cervical-vaginal infections, included those caused by Mycoplasma and Chlamydia trachomatis.Material And MethodAclinical, random, comparative, double-blind study included 50 patients assisting to infectology consult with diagnosis of mixed cervical-vaginal infection. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 25): fluconazole 37.5 mg, tinidazole 500 mg and azithromycin 250 mg; group B (n = 25): fluconazole 37.5 mg, tinidazole 500 mg and clindamycin 312.5 mg. Patients of both groups received two tablets twice p.o. for one day. Cultures were performed to corroborate the diagnosis and then to demonstrate effectiveness of the schemes studied. For the analysis of the data we used measures of central tendency, dispersion and inferential statistics for comparison of proportions by c2 and Fisher's exact tests with a significance level of p < 0.05.ResultsAll patient got clinical cure; however, regarding the microbiologic eradication a positive case was identified in group A, requiring rescue treatment. The compliance in both groups was of 100%. In both groups, statistical analysis did not show significant differences. Three patients in group A had mild adverse effects. Patients mean age was 33.4 +/- 5.3 years.ConclusionsBoth treatments showed similar effectiveness against mixed cervical-vaginal infections. Microbiological efficacy was of 96% and 100% in group A and B, respectively, besides, scheme of group B was better tolerated.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.