• M D Westfall, K R Price, M Lambert, R Himmelman, D Kacey, S Dorevitch, and J Mathews.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Mar 1;23(3):541-5.

Study ObjectiveTo compare the speed of IV access and the rate of infusion for saphenous venous cutdown and percutaneous femoral catheterization.DesignProspective, randomized, multicentered trial. Patient enrollment occurred from September 1990 through September 1991.SettingPatients were enrolled at three urban Level I trauma centers.Type Of ParticipantsSeventy-eight critically ill trauma patients.InterventionsParticipants were randomized to one of two groups: saphenous cutdown or percutaneous femoral line. After successful cannulation of the vein, 1 L of crystalloid was infused by gravity.ResultsThe mean procedure time for the cutdown group was 5.63 +/- 2.58 minutes compared with 3.18 +/- 1.19 minutes for the femoral line group (P < .0001). The mean infusion time for the cutdown group was 6.65 +/- 4.29 minutes compared with 4.56 +/- 2.47 minutes for the femoral line group (P < .03). The mean overall time for the cutdown group was 11.76 +/- 4.81 minutes compared with 7.67 +/- 2.78 minutes for the femoral line group (P < .0002).ConclusionPercutaneous femoral catheterization can be performed more rapidly than saphenous cutdown in the critically ill trauma patient with a palpable femoral pulse and allows for more rapid fluid administration. We support the use of a percutaneous femoral line as an acceptable alternative to saphenous venous cutdown in the initial resuscitation of trauma patients.

18 keywords...

hide…