• J Fierens, A M Wolthuis, F Penninckx, and A D'Hoore.
• Department of Abdominal Surgery, University hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven, Belgium.
• Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Sep 1;112(5):355-8.

BackgroundFast-track programs (ERAS) have been shown to improve postoperative recovery in colorectal surgery, combining newer anesthetic and minimally invasive surgery with evidence-based adjustments to facilitate revalidation. This prospective study evaluated the outcome of an ERAS protocol implementation in a university colorectal unit.MethodsBetween 2009 and 2010, 94 patients (49 males and 45 females) underwent an elective colorectal resection and were included in this protocol. All data were prospectively gathered in an electronic database. A cohort comparison was performed with 120 patients operated on in 2008 before ERAS implementation.ResultsThe median age was 58 years [range: 29-76 years] and the median ASA score was 2. All colorectal procedures (85 sigmoid resections, 7 right hemicolectomies and 2 low anterior resections) were performed laparoscopically, with a conversion rate of 9,5%. Complications were noted in 14 patients (14,9%); two patients (2,1%) required a laparoscopic drainage of an infected hematoma during initial hospital stay. A significant (p < 0,001) reduced median postoperative hospital stay of 4 days [range : 2-11 days] in the ERAS group, compared with 6 days [range : 3-37] in the non fast-track group was noted. Early readmission occurred in five patients (5,3%) because of anastomotic leakage (n = 2), ileus (n = 2) and a wound infection (n = 1).ConclusionThese results of length of stay, morbidity and readmission-rates have important implications for the organization of health care, waiting lists and costs. Therefore the ERAS principles should be more wide-spread implemented.

20 keywords...

hide…