• O A Smiseth, M A Frais, I Kingma, A V White, M L Knudtson, J M Cohen, D E Manyari, E R Smith, and J V Tyberg.
• J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1986 Feb 1;7(2):307-14.

AbstractExperimental studies have shown that right ventricular filling pressure (that is, intracavitary diastolic pressure) approximates pericardial surface pressure but, in many patients after removal of pericardial effusion, right ventricular filling pressure has been found to markedly exceed pericardial pressure recorded by an open catheter. The aim of this study was to determine whether this apparent contradiction was related to the technique of pericardial pressure measurement. Nine patients with chronic pericardial effusion were studied and, although these pressures diverged to varying degrees in individual patients, the previous observation was confirmed in that, although initially similar, right ventricular filling pressure and pericardial pressure (measured by means of an open catheter) tended to diverge during removal of the effusate; when the evacuation was as complete as possible pericardial pressure was 2.1 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SE), while right ventricular filling pressure was 8.7 +/- 1.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). In six open chest, anesthetized, volume-loaded dogs with pericardial effusion (50 ml), right ventricular filling pressure and pericardial pressures measured with both open catheter and flat balloon were all equal. With decreasing volume of pericardial fluid, right ventricular filling pressure and pericardial pressure (by catheter) diverged as had been observed in patients. However, pericardial pressure (balloon) continued to be equal to right ventricular filling pressure. (With 0 ml in the pericardium, right ventricular filling pressure = 12.9 +/- 0.9 mm Hg, pericardial pressure [catheter] = 1.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg and pericardial pressure [balloon] = 12.4 +/- 1.5 mm Hg.) Thus, these observations support the use of right ventricular filling pressure as an estimate of pericardial constraint in patients.

26 keywords...

hide…