-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation and block effectiveness during axillary block in unsedated ambulatory patients.
- Z J Koscielniak-Nielsen, H Rassmussen, and K Jepsen.
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. zjkn@rh.dk
- Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Sep 1;26(5):428-33.
Background And ObjectivesChronaxie of the motor-neurons (A-alpha) is shorter than that of the sensory A-delta and C neurons. Therefore, a short current impulse should elicit a painless muscle twitch. This randomized, double-blind study of patients having ambulatory axillary block by multiple neurostimulations compared patients' perception of electrical stimulation, latency, and quality of analgesia and the incidence of adverse effects.MethodsIn group S (short impulse, n = 44) 0.1-ms-current impulses were used and in group L (long impulse, n = 43) 0.3-ms impulses were used. Initial amplitude was 2 mA. Local anesthetic was injected near the 4 terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, radial) after reaching a target amplitude between 0.1 and 0.5 mA. Patients were specifically requested to categorize sensation of electrical stimulation "electric shocks" as follows: no discomfort, discomfort, pain. Pain was then quantified on a visual analog scale (VAS). Surgically ineffective blocks were supplemented after 30 minutes. A patient was defined as ready for surgery (complete block) when analgesia was present in all areas distal to the elbow.ResultsThere were no significant differences between groups in quali- and quantitative assessments of electrical stimulation. Eight patients (18%) in either group described the sensation as "strange or funny." Eight patients in group S and 13 (30%) in group L reported discomfort during stimulation. Twenty-eight patients (64%) in S group and 22 (52%) in L group experienced pain. Median VAS (0 to 100) of this pain was 21 and 24, respectively. Block performance time was 9 minutes in L group and 11 minutes in S group (P < .001), but the latency of analgesia was 23 minutes for both groups and the times to achieve complete block were, therefore, similar: 32 minutes in L group and 34 minutes in S group (not significant [NS]). Nine group S and 8 group L patients required supplementary blocks (NS). The incidence of vessel punctures and accidental intravascular injections were also similar in both groups.ConclusionsThis study did not confirm our hypothesis that short-current impulses (0.1 ms) make neurostimulation of peripheral nerves painless, by selectively depolarizing motor-neurons. Longer impulses (0.3 ms) shorten block performance time, probably by easier location of the nerves, but the clinical relevance of this finding is doubtful.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.