• Isr Med Assoc J · Mar 2010

    Comparative Study

    How to evaluate the child presenting with an apparent life-threatening event?

    • Karin Weiss, Aviva Fattal-Valevski, and Shimon Reif.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
    • Isr Med Assoc J. 2010 Mar 1;12(3):154-7.

    BackgroundInfants who have experienced an apparent life-threatening event typically undergo an extensive evaluation to rule out serious underlying conditions.ObjectivesTo evaluate the yield of different tests performed after an apparent life-threatening event and to identify high risk groups in which more extensive diagnostic tests are required.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in a children's hospital for a 4 year period and the charts of infants who were admitted with an apparent life-threatening event were reviewed. The yield for each diagnostic test was established according to the ratio of positive results contributing to the diagnosis of the apparent life-threatening event.ResultsThe study included 69 infants between the ages of 1 week and 1 year. There were abnormal findings in 36% of the cases. Gastroesophageal reflux was the most common diagnosis (60%). In the remaining patients the diagnosis was either seizures (12%) or respiratory tract infections (28%). Tests used for the diagnosis of cardiac, metabolic and nonrespiratory infections had no yield. A positive correlation was found between abnormal test results and abnormal physical examination (P = 0.001), an abnormal perinatal history (P = 0.017), and age older than 2 months (P = 0.002).ConclusionsThe yield of most of the tests performed after an apparent life-threatening event is low, especially in infants with a normal perinatal history and physical examination.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.