• A Verma, A Su, A M Golin, B O'Marrah, and J K Amorosa.
• University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08903-0019, USA.
• Acad Radiol. 2001 May 1;8(5):392-7.

Rationale And ObjectivesThe authors performed this study to evaluate whether any one conventional radiographic view is sufficient as a screening method in the detection of acute knee trauma.Materials And MethodsThe authors prospectively assessed the efficacy of a single conventional radiograph of the knee in the detection of signs of knee fractures in 214 consecutive adults with acute knee trauma. The evaluated efficacy parameters included specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value. The percentage reduction in the need for additional conventional radiographs was also calculated.ResultsFifty-three of the 214 patients (24.8%) had a knee fracture. The sensitivity of the single lateral view in the detection of knee fractures was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 94.3, 100). The lateral view of the traumatized knee was normal in 143 patients (66.8%). The probability of not having a fracture if the lateral view was normal (NPV) was also 100% (95% CI = 97.9, 100). The need for additional radiographs was reduced 67%.ConclusionA single lateral view as a screening tool for knee fractures has a very high sensitivity and NPV. Because more than 65% of the patients had a normal lateral view in this study, there can be a considerable amount of savings in terms of radiology services for these patients.

20 keywords...

hide…