• Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Sep 1985

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of cefotaxime, imipenem-cilastatin, ampicillin-gentamicin, and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in the treatment of experimental Escherichia coli bacteremia and meningitis.

    • K S Kim.
    • Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985 Sep 1;28(3):433-6.

    AbstractIn a search for more effective antimicrobial therapy of neonatal Escherichia coli infection, newer beta-lactam antibiotics, cefotaxime and imipenem, were evaluated for their activities against a K1 E. coli strain in vitro and in vivo, and the results were compared with those of conventional therapeutic regimens for neonatal E. coli infection: ampicillin-gentamicin and ampicillin-chloramphenicol. Measured by MICs and MBCs, cefotaxime and imipenem were 8- to 512-fold more active in vitro than the older agents. For in vivo studies, the following daily doses were used: 50 mg/kg for each of imipenem and cilastatin; 100 mg/kg for each of cefotaxime, ampicillin, and chloramphenicol; and 10 mg/kg for gentamicin. At these doses, the mean bactericidal titers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid were significantly greater with newer agents than with ampicillin-gentamicin and ampicillin-chloramphenicol. However, at the doses used, the newer agents were not more effective in vivo than the older agents. This was shown by the similarities in clearance of bacteria from blood and cerebrospinal fluid, incidences of meningitis in bacteremic animals, and mortality rates. Thus, although these two newer antibiotics are more active in vitro and produce greater bactericidal titers in vivo, they do not appear to be superior to conventional regimens for treatment of neonatal E. coli bacteremia and meningitis.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.