• Ioannis Aktselis, Constantine Kokoroghiannis, Evaggelos Fragkomichalos, Georgios Koundis, Anastasios Deligeorgis, Emmanouil Daskalakis, John Vlamis, and Nikolaos Papaioannou.
• 'E Orthopaedic Department, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Attica, Greece, aktselis@hotmail.com.
• Int Orthop. 2014 Jan 1;38(1):155-61.

PurposeThe purpose of this prospective randomised trial was to assess whether an intramedullary nail is superior to a sliding hip screw in the treatment of multifragmentary intertrochanteric fracturesMethodsEighty patients with a 31-A2.2 or A2.3 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) intertrochanteric fracture were randomly allocated to fixation with either the Gamma nail or the AMBI sliding hip screw device.ResultsAll patients were followed up at one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively, except for nine who died. There was no statistical difference in Parker mobility score between groups. The Gamma nail group had significantly higher Barthel Index and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scores than the AMBI group at 12 months. At the same time, the EQ-5D score had returned to its pre-operative values in the Gamma nail group but not in the AMBI group. There were no differences in mortality, radiation time and hospital stay. Duration of the operation, incision length and hip pain occurrence were significantly less in the Gamma nail group.ConclusionsFew failures occur when unstable 31-A2.2 and A2.3 AO/OTA fractures are fixed with a sliding hip screw. Nevertheless, an intramedullary nail seems superior in reconstituting patients to their pre-operative state.

27 keywords...

hide…