• Didier Keh, Serge Goodman, and Charles L Sprung.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. didier.keh@charite.de
• Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec 1;25(6):713-9.

AbstractCorticosteroids have been considered for decades for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock, based on their pivotal role in the stress response and their hemodynamic and antiinflammatory effects. Whereas short-term therapy with high doses of corticosteroids (up to 42 g hydrocortisone equivalent for 1-2 days) has been ineffective or potentially harmful, prolonged therapy with lower doses (200-300 mg hydrocortisone for 5-7 days or longer) in septic shock has recently revealed beneficial effects in several randomized, controlled trials. Assuming relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) and peripheral cortisol resistance, treatment with low-dose hydrocortisone improved shock reversal, reduced inflammation, and improved outcome. Shock reversal and reduction of mortality were more effective in patients with RAI, and most significant in patients with severe shock. Diagnosis of RAI with corticotropin tests in septic shock, however, is highly dependent on cut-off values and definition of RAI. Thus, it is not clear yet which patients benefit most from low-dose hydrocortisone and if treatment should be restricted to patients with RAI. In addition the role of fludrocortisone is uncertain. Nevertheless, based on current data, low-dose hydrocortisone therapy should definitely be considered in vasopressor-dependent septic shock. This review will address some critical points.

24 keywords...

hide…