• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Aug 1981

    Chronic pain and the questionable use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.

    • J C Rook, R N Pesch, and E C Keeler.
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981 Aug 1;62(8):373-6.

    AbstractSeveral studies have observed that patients who complain of chronic pain have significantly elevated scores on the first 3 clinical scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Some studies imply that this profile allows one to conclude that such patients exaggerate their symptoms, have strong feelings of inadequacy, have emotional problems which are neurotic, with implications that this is functional pain. The present study and its results challenges the use of the MMPI in attempting to distinguish psychogenic from organic pain. The MMPI was administered to 62 patients on their admission to the hospital. All 62 patients had a diagnosis of some organic findings consistent with their pain symptomatology. The average MMPI scores resulted in an elevated "Conversion-V" profile. It was also noted that as characteristics such as age of the subject, number of surgeries, and number of physicians seen increased, there was a corresponding increase in the neurotic scales. It was concluded that utmost caution should be used in interpreting individual pain patients' MMPI scores. It is especially important to avoid dismissing the pain symptomatology as functional by simply giving the patient a psychiatric diagnosis consistent with the profile. The potential of the MMPI as an aid in developing the treatment plan and as a possible predictive tool for certain treatment procedures is discussed. It is suggested that MMPI data be collected on a comparison group of patients, who have had successful relief of pain through surgical intervention.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…