• Matthew McCambridge, Kari Jones, Hannah Paxton, Kathy Baker, Elliot J Sussman, and Jeff Etchason.
• Division of Critical Care Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA 18105-7017, USA.
• Arch. Intern. Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):648-53.

BackgroundLittle evidence exists to support implementing various health information technologies, such as telemedicine, in intensive care units.MethodsA coordinated health information technology bundle (HITB) was implemented along with remote intensivist coverage (RIC) at a 727-bed academic community hospital. Critical care specialists provided bedside coverage during the day and RIC at night to achieve intensivist coverage 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. We evaluated the effect of HITB-RIC on mortality, ventilator and vasopressor use, and the intervention length of stay. We compared our results with those achieved at baseline.ResultsA total of 954 control patients who received care for 16 months before the implementation of HITB-RIC and 959 study patients who received care for 10 months after the implementation were included in the analysis. Mortality for the control and intervention groups were 21.4% and 14.7%, respectively. In addition, the observed mortality for the intervention group was 75.8% (P < .001) of that predicted by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality equations, which was 29.5% lower relative to the control group. Regression results confirm that the hospital mortality of the intensive care unit patients was significantly lower after implementation of the intervention, controlling for predicted risk of mortality and do-not-resuscitate status. Overall, intervention patients also had significantly less (P = .001) use of mechanical ventilation, controlling for body-system diagnosis category and severity of illness.ConclusionThe use of HITB-RIC was associated with significantly lower mortality and less ventilator use in critically ill patients.

19 keywords...

hide…