• Thomas B Repine, Philip Lisagor, and David J Cohen.
• Department of Hematology/Oncology, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX 79920, USA.
• Mil Med. 2005 Jun 1;170(6):505-9.

AbstractTriage of medical care, whether necessary because of routine daily limitations or forced by exceptional circumstances, such as for soldiers injured in combat or civilians in mass casualty situations, is increasingly coming under scrutiny. The decisions that limit access to fundamental and even life-or-death treatments are fraught with controversy. These decisions are difficult for the medical provider to make and are even more difficult for the patient to understand. Medical providers are poorly trained to address the numerous factors involved in triage decisions under the pressure of limited time. Patients are understandably selfish and short-sighted regarding their own care. Both provider and patient can feel that triage is immoral. In contrast, when triage is taught proactively and reviewed relative to the situation, the ethical principles that guide triage are evident and intact. Both provider and patient must learn the considerations and consequences of triage.

14 keywords...

hide…