• BJOG · Apr 2005

    Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.

    • Salma Imran Kayani and Zarko Alfirevic.
    • Liverpool Women's Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
    • BJOG. 2005 Apr 1;112(4):451-5.

    BackgroundThe issues related to safety of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section remain controversial. The main adverse outcome fuelling this debate is a "small" risk of uterine rupture that is potentially devastating for both the mother and the fetus.ObjectiveTo estimate the risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence in women who require induction of labour with previous caesarean sections.DesignFive year retrospective review of computerised hospital records and case note review of index cases.SettingLarge inner city teaching hospital.PopulationTwo hundred and five women who had their labour induced with history of one lower segment caesarean section.MethodsThis study was conducted at Liverpool Women's Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, with approximately 6000 births per annum. We searched the hospital's computerised records of deliveries from June 1997 to June 2002 and reviewed all indications and outcomes of induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section. Women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation were then divided into three groups: those with one previous caesarean section and no previous vaginal deliveries, those whose last delivery was a caesarean section but had delivered vaginally before and those whose last delivery was by vaginal route, but had had one caesarean section in the past.Main Outcome MeasuresUterine rupture or dehiscence, adverse neonatal outcome.ResultsTwo hundred and five women were included. There were four cases of uterine rupture and one dehiscence (2.4%, 95% CI 0.8-5.6%). Two babies were profoundly acidotic at birth, but all five neonates were healthy when discharged from hospital with no long term morbidity. All five cases occurred in the group of women with no previous vaginal deliveries. The intrauterine pressure catheter recordings had contributed to the diagnosis of uterine rupture/dehiscence in three out of five cases.ConclusionIn women with previous caesarean section and no vaginal deliveries, induction of labour carries a relatively high risk of uterine rupture/dehiscence despite all precautions, including intrauterine pressure monitoring.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…