-
Comparative Study
Mouth-to-mask ventilation: a superior method of rescue breathing.
- R R Harrison, K I Maull, R L Keenan, and C P Boyan.
- Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Feb 1;11(2):74-6.
AbstractTidal volumes achieved using endotracheal intubation with a self-inflating bag were compared to those achieved with the esophageal obturator airway, a bag-valve mask system, and mouth-to-mask ventilation in an experimental model employing 18 unskilled and 4 partially skilled rescuers. When compared to mean tidal volumes achieved with endotracheal intubation (1,193 ml with unskilled, 942 ml with semi-skilled rescuers), ventilation with the bag-valve-mask system was significantly less (509 and 495 ml tidal volumes) and was, in fact, well below the value of 800 ml recommended for rescue breathing. Mouth-to-mask ventilation produced tidal volumes (1,093 ml and 1,200 ml) not significantly different from those seen with endotracheal intubation. If clinical findings confirm these experimental results, mouth-to-mask ventilation should replace the bag-valve-mask system in the initial management of respiratory arrest.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..