-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Aug 1999
Comparative StudyBi-directional cavopulmonary shunt: is accessory pulsatile flow, good or bad?
- H J van de Wal, R Ouknine, D Tamisier, M Lévy, P R Vouhé, and F Leca.
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular surgery, Laennec Hospital, Paris, France. vandewal@wxs.nl
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Aug 1;16(2):104-10.
ObjectiveEvaluation of the effect and long-term outcome of accessory pulsatile blood flow versus classical bi-directional cavopulmonary connection (BCPC).MethodsRetrospective review of the medical and surgical records.ResultsTwo-hundred and five patients (119 boys, 86 girls) underwent BCPC from 1990 to 1996. Accessory pulsatile flow was present in 68%, flow being maintained through the pulmonary trunc in 46%, systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt in 13% and mixed in 7%, or patent ductus arteriosus in 2%. Patients with accessory pulsatile flow had lower hospital mortality (3% versus 5%), while mean pulmonary artery pressure (14.1 versus 12.6 mmHg P = 0.050) and increase of oxygen saturation (12.4 versus 8.7, P = 0.034) were significantly higher. The period of artificial ventilation (1.9 day) and ICU stay (6 days) did not differ for both groups. Late mortality was higher following accessory pulsatile flow (6% versus 1%). At late follow-up patients with accessory pulsatile flow had significantly higher oxygen saturation (mean 85 +/- 4%, versus 79 +/- 4%; P < or = 0.005). If subsequent completion of Fontan is considered the optimal palliation and subsequent systemic to pulmonary artery shunt, arteriovenous fistula and transplantation is considered a failure, patients with accessory pulsatile flow had significantly more and earlier completion of the Fontan procedure (mean 1.7 +/- 2.4 years, versus 2.7 +/- 4.4 years; P = 0.008). Survival is not influenced by age at bi-directional cavopulmonary shunt surgery, left or right functional ventricular anatomy or previous palliative surgery. One patient with accessory pulsatile flow developed systemic-to-pulmonary collateral's eventually requiring lobectomy.ConclusionDespite two different initial palliative techniques the outcome was not significantly different. Accessory pulsatile blood flow appeared not to be a contra-indication for a completion Fontan procedure. Moreover, the data suggest that after accessory pulsatile flow can safely be performed, at late follow-up oxygen saturation is higher, while, significantly more and earlier completion of Fontan occurred. Age at bi-directional cavopulmonary shunt, basic left or right ventricular anatomy or previous palliative surgery did not influence survival.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.