• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Aug 1994

    Evaluation of definitions for adult respiratory distress syndrome.

    • W A Knaus, X Sun, R B Hakim, and D P Wagner.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1994 Aug 1;150(2):311-7.

    AbstractWe conducted a cohort study of 423 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with a primary clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory failure, a PaO2/FIO2 on ICU admission of < 300 mm Hg, and an ICD-9 discharge diagnosis of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (518.5 or 518.82) drawn from a nationally representative database of 17,440 ICU admissions to evaluate current and proposed revisions for definitions of ARDS. A variety of nonpulmonary physiologic risk factors, from shock to elevated serum bilirubin measurements, were significant (p < 0.01) for hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis using the admission APACHE III score, primary ICU admission diagnosis, and treatment location before ICU admission provided greater accuracy in prediction (ROC = 0.80) than the individual PaO2/FIO2 (ROC = 0.68). Patients were given an individual risk of hospital mortality based on their admission APACHE III score, treatment location before ICU admission, and ICU admitting diagnosis. Dividing the patient population into groups using a PaO2/FIO2 < or = 150 resulted in a wide range of individual risk for hospital mortality, from < 10 to > 90% in both groups. We conclude that ARDS is a complex clinical entity with a variety of pulmonary and nonpulmonary risk factors for both its development and its prognosis. Current and proposed categorical definitions based on the severity of hypoxemia result in a wide distribution of individual patient risks. Use of these findings in the design and conduct of future clinical trials would improve the evaluation of new therapies.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…