• Liesbeth Bax, Arend-Jan J Woittiez, Hans J Kouwenberg, Willem P T M Mali, Erik Buskens, Frederik J A Beek, Branko Braam, Frans T M Huysmans, Leo J Schultze Kool, Matthieu J C M Rutten, Cornelius J Doorenbo... more s, Johannes C N M Aarts, Ton J Rabelink, Pierre-François Plouin, Alain Raynaud, Gert A van Montfrans, Jim A Reekers, Anton H van den Meiracker, Peter M T Pattynama, Peter J G van de Ven, Dammis Vroegindeweij, Abraham A Kroon, Michiel W de Haan, Cornelis T Postma, and Jaap J Beutler. less
• Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
• Ann. Intern. Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):840-8, W150-1.

BackgroundLittle is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function.ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function.DesignRandomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment.Setting10 European medical centers.Participants140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) and ARAS of 50% or greater.InterventionStent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin.MeasurementsThe primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.ResultsForty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to cholesterol embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points.LimitationMany patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting.ConclusionStent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.

27 keywords...

hide…