• Elena Aldasoro, Adelina Pérez Alonso, Laureano Ribacoba, Santiago Esnaola, Maite Olaizola, Jose Antonio Carrera, Ana Bañuelos, and Rosa Rico.
• Service of Studies and Research, Department of Health of the Basque Government, 1 Donostia-San Sebastián, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 01010. ealdasoro-san@ej-gv.es
• Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Jan 1;21(4):464-70.

ObjectivesDuring the final period of life, patients with cancer in the Basque Country are given treatment in different types of hospital care. This study compared the quality of care according to the type of care in one of the autonomous communities in Spain.MethodsA retrospective study was carried out of cancer patients who died in conventional hospital services, home hospitalization services, and palliative care units. In addition to hospital stay and readmission number, variables based on the recommendations of Spanish Society for Palliative Care were studied.ResultsEnd-of-life was diagnosed in 57 percent of a sample of 486 patients, 3 days before death (median). The use of symptom control scales was only documented in the clinical records of eight patients. Sociofamily evaluation was not found. Patients in conventional hospital services were less frequently diagnosed with end-of-life and agony and were significantly different from the rest in the reasons for admission, symptoms assessed, drugs used, administration routes, and dosage forms. Pain was evaluated in 50 percent of the patients and was better controlled in palliative care units. Patients not diagnosed with agony (52 percent) were more frequently not given specific treatment.ConclusionsEnd-of-life in cancer patients was diagnosed too late. The quality of care in palliative care units and by home hospitalization service was better than that in conventional hospitalization. Nevertheless, there were areas for improvement in the three modalities of care.

16 keywords...

hide…