• Minerva anestesiologica · Apr 2007

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Fluid challenge in patients submitted to spinal block.

    • A Donati, M Scarcella, R Nardella, V Zompanti, L Sinkovetz, S Iuorio, and P Pelaia.
    • Department of Neuroscience, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Marche Polytechnical University, Ancona, Italy. donati.abele@tiscali.it
    • Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 Apr 1;73(4):213-8.

    AimThe practice of routinely prehydrating patients by infusing a colloid solution for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension has been challenged recently. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a 15 mL/kg pre-emptive bolus of colloids (6% hydroxyhethyl starch) on heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI) in patients submitted to subarachnoid block with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 0.2 mg/kg for orthopedic surgery of the lower limb.MethodsPatients were monitored by a Model Flow method. Forty patients (ASA I-II) scheduled to undergo to spinal anesthesia for elective orthopedic surgery of the lower limb were enrolled in the study. The 20 patients in Group A were treated with a preanesthetic infusion of 15 mL/kg of hydroxyhaethyl starch 6%, Group B (20 untreated patients) was the control group. HR, MAP, CI were collected at T0 (first relevation); T1 (after 5 min from the spinal block); T2 (after 10 min); T3 (after 15 min); T4 (after 20 min); T5 (after 25 min); T6 (after 30 min); T7 (after 35 min).ResultsOur data show that MAP value is higher in treated patients than in control group (ANOVA: P<0.001) and at T1 in Group B MAP was lower than at T0 (P<0.05). HR and CI trend appear similar in the 2 groups. Our results show that heart rate is not affected by colloid infusion. This may be due to the substantial cardiovascular stability of the selective spinal anesthesia, which does not activate a clinical relevant compensatory vagal effect. Fluid prehydration would expand the vascular space and hence compensate for the reduction in systemic vascular resistance, although MAP reduction following the induction of spinal anesthesia is present in both treated and control groups.ConclusionOur data show that despite to fluid challenge, we could not prevent MAP decrease in Group A, even if it is more marked in Group B.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.