-
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd · Jan 1998
Multicenter Study[The diagnostic value of rectal examination of patients with acute appendicitis].
- K Kremer, M Kraemer, K H Fuchs, and C Ohmann.
- Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Würzburg.
- Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998 Jan 1;115:1120-2.
AbstractThe results of rectal digital examinations performed on 477 patients upon admission with histopathologically proven acute appendicitis from a total of 2280 patients with acute abdominal pain were analyzed. Although 13.7% of the patients experienced pain on the right side and 7.4% pain in the pouch of Douglas during rectal examination, none of the rectal examination parameters was statistically significant for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. There are well established and statistically significant clinical indications, such as guarding, rigidity, rebound tenderness or abdominal distention that actually make the unpleasant rectal-digital examination superfluous for patients with suspected appendicitis.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..