• Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Modified Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound Versus Conventional Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    • ZheFeng Quan, Ming Tian, Ping Chi, YingHao Cao, Xin Li, and KeJun Peng.
    • From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing YouAn Hospital, and †Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
    • Anesth. Analg.. 2014 Jul 1;119(1):163-9.

    BackgroundCurrently, short-axis out-of-plane (SA-OOP) and long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) ultrasound techniques are used to guide radial artery cannulation. In this study, we compared the success rate of a modified SA-OOP technique with that of traditional LA-IP.MethodsOne hundred sixty-four patients who were to undergo liver surgery or splenic resection under general anesthesia were included. Using a sealed envelope method, patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: the modified SA-OOP or the LA-IP ultrasound guidance approaches. The number of cannula insertion attempts until success was recorded in both groups. The primary end point to compare the groups was the rate of cannula insertion successes on the first attempt. The secondary end points were also recorded and compared: insertion failure rate, inner diameter of the radial artery, depth of artery from the skin, ultrasonic location time, cannulation time, and vascular complications including thrombosis, hematoma, edema, and vasospasm.ResultsThe cannula insertion success rate on the first attempt was significantly higher in the modified SA-OOP group compared with the LA-IP group (proportion difference 15.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-30.7%, P = 0.0158). However, the insertion failure rate was not different between groups (95% CI, -17.7% to 12.8%, P = 0.4969). The ultrasonic location time was significantly decreased in the modified SA-OOP group compared with the LA-IP group (mean difference -9.5 seconds, 95% CI, -10.6 to -8.5 seconds, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between groups for cannulation time (95% CI, -0.6 to 7.6 seconds, P = 0.1152), depth of artery (95% CI, -0.07 to 0.57 mm, P = 0.1050), and the diameter of the radial artery (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.03 mm, P = 0.1153).ConclusionThe modified SA-OOP technique may improve the success rate of cannula insertion into the radial artery on the first attempt.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…