• Bart T J Meursing, Dennie W Wulterkens, and Robert G van Kesteren.
• Department of Cardiology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbox 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands. b.meursing@chello.nl
• Resuscitation. 2005 Mar 1;64(3):279-86.

AbstractIn 1982 the Netherlands made a unilateral decision to change the established airway-breathing-circulation (ABC) training sequence to a different approach that stressed efficiency in diagnosis and treatment. This Dutch approach became known as the CAB (circulation-airway-breathing) sequence. Twenty years later, being confronted with the new international guidelines (published 2000) that still use the ABC approach, the Netherlands Resuscitation Council (NRR) questioned again the validity of our persistence in using the "Dutch variant" of resuscitation. This resulted in revised national guidelines that conform again with the international guidelines. This article restates the main rationale and arguments behind the original decision to change to a Dutch (CAB) version of resuscitation over 20 years ago. The national decision to adopt the ABC approach once again was mainly to prevent resuscitation in the Netherlands from being isolated from the rest of the world and was not based on present knowledge of physiology and resuscitation. The authors hope that this article will open the discussion once again.

17 keywords...

hide…