• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. · May 1976

    Comparative Study

    Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a new need for old skills. A preliminary report.

    • J R Imig and R P Perkins.
    • Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976 May 1;125(1):51-4.

    AbstractPreliminary results of the effect of extraperitoneal cesarean section on operative and postoperative morbidity are presented. The extraperitoneal technique did not prolong delivery time or operative time, as compared to transperitoneal cesarean section. Postoperative febrile morbidity seemed to be less in the patients who had extraperitoneal cesarean section, even when compared to randomly selected transperitoneal cases. Further data will be necessary to conclude that renewed interest in this technique is warranted.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…