• Pain · Dec 1989

    Validation of an observation method of pain assessment in non-chronic back pain.

    • I B Jensen, L A Bradley, and S J Linton.
    • Department of Occupational Medicine, Orebro Medical Center Hospital, Sweden.
    • Pain. 1989 Dec 1;39(3):267-74.

    AbstractAn observation method for assessing chronic pain in back pain and rheumatoid arthritis has been developed during the last decade in the U.S.A. This study examined the validity and reliability of the method for a non-chronic back pain population from another culture. Two trained observers recorded pain behaviors displayed by 61 Swedish subjects during a 10 min, videorecorded, standardized sequence of maneuvers. Subjects were asked to make ratings of their pain intensity, depression, helplessness and disability level. A physical examination was performed by an orthopedist to obtain objective medical information about the subjects. Results showed that interrater as well as test-retest reliability were satisfactory. Correlations between pain behavior and other measures of pain, e.g., intensity ratings, medication intake, and spinal mobility, were statistically significant but somewhat lower than expected. The results indicate that the behavioral observation method provides reliable and valid information about non-chronic back pain among Swedish females. However, some modifications in the standardized sequence of maneuvers and the definitions of pain behaviors may be necessary to improve the utility of the method in this population.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…