• Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot · Oct 2002

    [Validation of a self-administered functional evaluation questionnaire after surgical treatment of lumbar spine stenosis].

    • P Guigui, L Rillardon, A Veil-Picard, A Blamoutier, P Heissler, M Benoist, and A Deburge.
    • Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.pierre.guigui@bjn.ap-hop-paris.fr
    • Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Oct 1;88(6):601-12.

    Purpose Of The StudyThe main aim of this prospective, multicentric, observational study was to validate a self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with lumbar spine stenosis treated surgically.Material And MethodsThe self-administered questionnaire was composed of eight questions exploring three dimensions: lumbalgia, radiculalgia, radicular ischemia. This questionnaire was associated with an index of neurological involvement (to take into account objective neurological data), and with an index of patient satisfaction (to assess the patient's perception of the impact of surgery on lumbalgia, radiculalgia, and gait disorders). The scoring scale was validated by studying the structure of the questionnaire (to ascertain the pertinence of the proposed three dimensions), by determining the questionnaire's reproducibility (intraobserver variability) and sensitivity to change, and by examining the contents of the questions (to assess the capacity of the scale to effectively measure the parameters it was designed to measure). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and principal component analysis were used to assess the questionnaire's structure. Reproducibility was tested on 49 patients who completed the self-administered questionnaire twice at a 15-day interval; intraclass correlation coefficients were determined. Sensibility was tested by correlating variation in the scores obtained pre- and postoperatively with the index of satisfaction; mean standard responses were determined. The validity of the questionnaire's content was assessed by correlating the scores obtained with the questionnaire to those obtained with three other self-administered questionnaires: SF36, EIFEL2 and GHA38.ResultsThis work included 104 patients, 96 of whom were reviewed at consultations 6 and 12 months after surgery. The principal components analysis confirmed the presence of the three dimensions. The global Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.86. The global intraclass coefficient of correlation was 0.95, varying from 0.86 to 0.97 depending on the dimension studied. There was a good correlation (0.82) between changes in the score studied and the index of satisfaction. All the mean standardized responses were higher than 1, indicating good sensitivity to change. There was also a good correlation between the questionnaire tested and the EIFEL2 self-administered questionnaire and the following dimensions of the SF36: physical activity, physical pain, vitality, and limitation due to physical pain.Discussion And ConclusionAssociating a simple 8-question self-administered questionnaire with an index of satisfaction (4 questions) and an objective index of neurological involvement provided a reliable, sensitive, and reproducible assessment of the changes in functional disorders resulting from lumber stenosis before and after surgical treatment.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.