• Orvosi hetilap · May 1999

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    [Caudal epidural injection in the management of lumbosacral nerve pain syndromes].

    • A Apáthy, G Penczner, E Licker, A Eiben, G Bálint, G Genti, and A Paksy.
    • Országos Reumatológiai és Fizioterápiás Intézet, Budapest.
    • Orv Hetil. 1999 May 9;140(19):1055-8.

    AbstractThe effect of epidural steroid injections was assessed in 39 patients with lumbar nerve root compression syndromes in a double-blind controlled trial, the patients were allocated at random to 3 groups. In group A (n = 13) the patients received a caudal epidural injection of 1 ml (7 mg) bethametason (Diprophos) in 10 ml normal saline and 20 ml local anesthetic (Lignocaine 1%). The second group B (n = 13) received a caudal epidural injection of 20 ml local anaesthetic (Lignocaine 1%) and 10 ml normal saline. The third group C (n = 13) received a superficial injection of 1 ml (7 mg) bethametason around of the sacral hiatus. All injections were performed by the same experienced anaesthesiologist. An independent physician, who was not aware which type of injection had been given, carried out the clinical measurements and the evaluation. Taking of analgesic drug Tramadol was permitted. The symptoms were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS 100 mm), lumbar flexion (Schober and finger-floor distance), the angle of raised leg sign (RLS degrees), and by complete neurological examination, the investigation was made 5 times (1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks after epidural injections). The results between 0-1 week and 0-4 week were statistically analysed by Student-, Wilcoxon-, and Mann-Whitney test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The mean VAS values decreased in time in all patient groups. There was no difference between the three treatment groups either after one or after 4 weeks by ANOVA. The mobility of the lumbar spine improved in all patient groups, but there was no significant difference between the three treatment groups. The raised led sign--values improved in all patient groups. There was a significant difference between the three treatment groups by ANOVA after one week, due to the difference between group A and C. After four weeks there was no significant difference. No major complications or side effects were seen in our trial. The raised leg sign due to epidural steroid injection showed better results in comparison to steroid injection around of the sacral hiatus were seen.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.