• H Buchinger, S Kreuer, M Paxian, R Larsen, and W Wilhelm.
• Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg/Saar. heiko.buchinger@uniklinik-saarland.de
• Anaesthesist. 2006 Aug 1; 55 (8): 854-60.

BackgroundIn the present investigation we compared the consumption of desflurane (DES) and isoflurane (ISO) using a standardized minimal-flow protocol with a forced reduction of the fresh gas flow (FGF).Methods54 adult women were examined. After induction of anaesthesia a forced reduction of the FGF was started: 5 min 0.5 l/min O(2) + 1 l/min N(2)O, 10 min 0.5 l/min O(2) + 0.5 l/min N(2)O; finally 0.3 l/min O(2) + 0.2 l/min N(2)O up to the end of surgery. The consumption of DES/ISO was determined with a precision balance.ResultsIn the DES group the uptake was around 0.3 vol-%, i.e. less than 8% of the target 2/3 MAC value was taken up. For ISO the uptake was around 0.25 vol-%, i.e. the uptake was approximately 30% of the target 2/3-MAC value. The DES consumption was after 60 min 17.0+/-1.1 g, 120 min--27.3+/-1.8 g and 180 min--36.5+/-1.7 g. ISO consumption was significantly lower: 7.6+/-0.8 g, 12.4+/-1.7 g and 15.5+/-1.6 g. The use of DES yielded higher costs, i.e. 2.28 EUR for 60 min, 3.63 EUR for 120 min and 4.97 EUR for 180 min. The consumption of the inhaled anaesthetics can be calculated as: DES (g)=4.84+0.184 x duration (min) (R(2)=0.981), ISO (g)=2.049+0.0826 x duration (R(2)=0.979). The costs are: DES (EUR)=0.85+0.0323 x duration (min); ISO (EUR)=0.19+0.0077 x duration (min).ConclusionWith a forced reduction of the FGF the DES consumption is still higher.

20 keywords...

hide…