• Med Eng Phys · Apr 2012

    Comparative Study

    Protocols to compare infusion distribution of wound catheters.

    • Marina Campolo, Dafne Molin, Narinder Rawal, and Alfredo Soldati.
    • Center for Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. marina.campolo@uniud.it
    • Med Eng Phys. 2012 Apr 1;34(3):326-32.

    AbstractMulti-holed wound catheters are increasingly used in clinical practice to administer analgesic/anaesthetic locally to the painful region. The distribution of flow infused during controlled (continuous or intermittent) administration of medication is believed to be an important issue for successful pain relief. Nevertheless, this information is not available from the literature. In this paper, we propose protocols to screen the performance of wound infusion catheters in the laboratory environment. Four wound infusion systems (PAINfusor by Baxter, OnQ Pump with Soaker catheter by I-Flow, PolyFuser Polymedic by Temena and Infiltralong by Pajunk) have been tested. Test results demonstrate that the distribution of the infused flow is different for the four catheters and closely connected to the catheter design (i.e. hole size and position, lumen diameter). Catheters characterized by small size holes (e.g. Baxter, Pajunk) distribute the flow more homogeneously than catheters characterized by large size holes (e.g. I-Flow, Temena). The distribution of infused flow does not change significantly during continuous or intermittent infusion.Copyright © 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    hide…