• Lee Andrew Kissane, Baku Ikeda, Reiko Akizuki, Shoko Nozaki, Kimio Yoshimura, and Naoki Ikegami.
• Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University Medical School, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: lak10016@gmail.com.
• Health Policy. 2015 Nov 1; 119 (11): 1472-81.

PurposeTo determine under different End-of-Life (EoL) scenarios the preferences of the general public for EoL care setting and Life-sustaining-Treatments (LST), and to develop a new framework to assess these preferences.MethodUsing a 2-stage, geographical cluster sampling method, we conducted a postal survey across Japan of 2000 adults, aged 20+. Four EoL scenarios were used: cancer, cardiac failure, dementia and persistent vegetative state (PVS).ResultsWe received 969 valid responses (response rate 48.5%). Preference for EoL care setting varied by illness with those wishing to spend EoL at home only 39% for cancer, 22% for cardiac failure, and 10-11% for dementia and PVS. Preference for LST differed by scenario and treatment type. In cancer, cardiac failure and dementia, about half to two thirds expressed a preference for antibiotics and fluid drip infusion but few for nasogastric (NG) tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Although our models accounted for only 3-9% of the variance, preferences to receive LST were associated with preference to spend EoL in hospital for cancer and cardiac failure but not dementia.ConclusionsFew people preferred to die at home, while a preference for hospital was largely determined by factors other than preference for LST.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…