• T Mutoh, K Kojima, K Takao, R Nishimura, and N Sasaki.
• Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
• J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2001 May 1;48(4):223-30.

AbstractRapid mask induction can be a useful induction technique for veterinary patients, although it is often accompanied by exaggerated excitement responses in unpremedicated animals (Mutoh et al.: Jpn. J. Vet. Anesth. Surg. 26, 109-116; J. Vet. Med. Sci. 57, 1007-1013; J. Vet. Med. Sci. 57, 1121-1124; 1995). The aim of this study was to compare sevoflurane with isoflurane for rapid mask induction in six dogs sedated by a combination of midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg). Induction with sevoflurane (5%, 2.4 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) in O2 resulted in shorter time to loss of the palpebral reflex, negative tail clamp response, and successful intubation than with isoflurane (3%, 2.4 MAC) in O2. There were no changes in heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure during induction with sevoflurane, whereas an increase in heart rate was observed in dogs induced with isoflurane. A decrease in respiratory rate compared with the pre-induction rate was observed during induction, and associated mild respiratory acidosis, characterized by an increase in arterial PCO2, was measured at the end of the induction period in both induction groups. None of the animals had episodes of induction-related complications. These results suggest that both sevoflurane and isoflurane produce a smooth onset of induction in midazolam and butorphanol-sedated dogs. Sevoflurane is a more suitable for rapid mask induction than isoflurane since it provides faster induction associated with a lower blood/gas partition coefficient.

20 keywords...

hide…