• A Bowyer, J Jakobsson, O Ljungqvist, and C Royse.
• Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
• Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov 1;69(11):1266-78.

AbstractTo date, postoperative quality of recovery lacks a universally accepted definition and assessment technique. Current quality of recovery assessment tools vary in their development, breadth of assessment, validation, use of continuous vs dichotomous outcomes and focus on individual vs group recovery. They have progressed from identifying pure restitution of physiological parameters to multidimensional assessments of postoperative function and patient-focused outcomes. This review focuses on the progression of these tools towards an as yet unreached ideal that would provide multidimensional assessment of recovery over time at the individual and group level. A literature search identified 11 unique recovery assessment tools. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale assesses recovery in multiple domains, including physiological, nociceptive, emotive, activities of daily living, cognition and patient satisfaction. It addresses recovery over time and compares individual patient data with base line, thus describing resumption of capacities and is an acceptable method for identification of individual patient recovery.© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

6 keywords...

hide…