• Arch Surg Chicago · Mar 1995

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

    • R K Orr, B S Maini, F D Sottile, E M Dumas, and P O'Mara.
    • Department of Surgery, Fallon Healthcare System, Worcester, Mass.
    • Arch Surg Chicago. 1995 Mar 1;130(3):301-6.

    ObjectiveTo assess the validity of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery by using an independent surgical database.DesignA prospective observational study wherein predicted mortality for each patient was obtained by using four different published severity-adjusted models.SettingA university-affiliated teaching community hospital.PatientsEight hundred sixty-eight consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery without accompanying valve or aneurysm repair during the period from 1991 to 1993.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasuresPredicted mortality rates for each model were obtained by averaging individual patient predictions and were compared with actual morality rates. We assessed the accuracy of overall prediction for the total series, as well as compared individual patient predictions created by each model. The discrimination of models was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.ResultsThe observed crude mortality rate was 3.7%. The predicted mortality rate ranged from 2.8% to 9.2%, despite relatively good discrimination by the models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70 to 0.74). The individual patient mortality predicted by different models varied by as much as a ninefold difference.ConclusionsThe currently used coronary artery bypass graft predictive models, although generally accurate, have significant shortcomings and should be used with caution. The predicted mortality rate following coronary artery bypass graft surgery varied by a factor of 3.3 from lowest to highest, making the choice of model a critical factor when assessing outcome. The use of these models for individual patient risk estimations is risky because of the marked discrepancies in individual predictions created by each model.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…