• Journal of neurology · Sep 2013

    Validation of the German version of the extended ALS functional rating scale as a patient-reported outcome measure.

    • Susanne Abdulla, Stefan Vielhaber, Sonja Körner, Judith Machts, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Reinhard Dengler, and Susanne Petri.
    • Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. Abdulla.Susanne@mh-hannover.de
    • J. Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;260(9):2242-55.

    AbstractThe revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) is a well-established rating instrument to assess the functional status of ALS patients. A recent innovation was the addition of three further items designed to improve its sensitivity at lower levels of physical function (ALSFRS-Extension, ALSFRS-EX). Neither the ALSFRS-R nor the ALSFRS-EX has been validated in German yet. The aim of the present study was the validation of the German version of a self-administered form of the ALSFRS-EX. Seventy-six patients participated in the study. Psychometric analysis included reliability assessment and factorial analysis. To evaluate convergent validity, correlations between ALSFRS-EX items and the MRC score, spasticity, tongue movement, pulmonary function, ALSAQ-40 and Borg dyspnoea scales (upright and supine) were performed. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha (total scale 0.868, subscales 0.690-0.938) and corrected item to total correlations (all above 0.50) was high. Test-retest reliability assessed by Spearman's rho (0.882-0.972) and Cohen's Kappa (0.63-0.92) was also high. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded a four-factor solution accounting for approximately 79% of the variance. Clinical parameters were strongly correlated with respective items and subscores of the ALSFRS-EX (muscle strength 0.568-0.833 p < 0.01; spasticity -0.236 to -0.376 p < 0.05; tongue movement 0.437-0.818 p < 0.01; pulmonary function 0.485-0.577 p < 0.01). ALSAQ-40 and Borg score correlated highly with the corresponding ALSFRS-EX items. The German self-report version of the ALSFRS-EX possesses very good psychometric properties similar to the original scale including high internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as excellent convergent validity.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…