• J Med Econ · Jan 2013

    Time since diagnosis, treatment pathways and current pain status: a retrospective assessment in a back pain population.

    • Paul C Langley and Hiltrud Liedgens.
    • College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, MN 55455, USA. Langley@maimonresearch.com
    • J Med Econ. 2013 Jan 1;16(5):701-9.

    ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to report on long-term treatment patterns in a back pain population and to consider whether these may be considered as reflective of under-treatment of pain or poor pain control.MethodsData are from a commissioned recontact SELECT survey of persons who had previously reported experiencing pain in the 2010 National Health and Wellness Survey. The analysis covers five countries: the UK, France, Spain, Germany and Italy. It is restricted to patients who reported moderate or severe pain in the last 3 months and who were judged to be experiencing back pain from the pain conditions reported. A total of 1018 subjects met the back pain criteria. Of these, 738 had their back pain initially diagnosed by a physician. It is this latter group that is the focus for the analysis. Subjects were further allocated to categories to assess potential pain chronicity and the intensity and self-limiting aspects of pain experience.ResultsIrrespective of the pain classification used, 56.10% of subjects in this back pain population report their first physician diagnosis of pain as occurring at least 6 years ago. At the same time 36.81% report experiencing severe pain in the last 3 months and 63.69% moderate pain. Overall, 53.11% of respondents are assessed as experiencing probable chronic pain and 24.12% as possible chronic pain. Among those experiencing probable chronic pain, 61.48% were diagnosed with back pain more than 6 years ago. In addition, 43.22% of respondents found the impact of pain on daily activities to be severely limiting and 22.63% found it to be moderately limiting. The majority of subjects, whether they were diagnosed and treated initially by primary care or another physician specialty, apparently experience no change in their treatment regimen. The absence of treatment change is 69.03% in the case of those experiencing severe pain and 84.89% in the case of those with moderate pain (p < 0.05).LimitationsThe NHWS is an internet survey, as a self-report there is no separate validation of pain experience reported; as subjects are asked to recall pain and treatment experience there is the possibility of recall error and bias.ConclusionsTwo features of this analysis stand out: (i) time since first diagnosis of pain for those currently experiencing severe or moderate back pain and (ii) the 'inertia' that appears to characterize long-term treatment decisions. Irrespective of current pain status, 70% or more of those experiencing current severe or moderate pain report no change from their initial treating physician or no change in prescription once referred to a pain specialist. This occurs over an extended time frame. Whether this should be interpreted as a failure in pain management is a moot point. The fact remains, however, that despite time since first diagnosis subjects not only currently experience severe or moderate pain but a substantial proportion may be expected to continue.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.