• A H Idris, M J Banner, V Wenzel, R S Fuerst, L B Becker, and R J Melker.
• Department of Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0392.
• Resuscitation. 1994 Oct 1;28(2):143-50.

ObjectiveTo compare the tidal volume, minute ventilation, and gas exchange caused by mechanical chest compression with and without mechanical ventilatory support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a laboratory model of cardiac arrest.DesignA laboratory swine model of CPR was used. Eight animals with and eight animals without mechanical ventilation received chest compression (100/min) for 10 min. Coronary perfusion pressure, tidal volume, and minute ventilation were recorded continuously.InterventionsVentricular fibrillation for 6 min without CPR, then mechanical chest compression for 10 min.ResultsDuring the first minute of chest compression, mean (+/- S.D.) minute ventilation was 11.2 +/- 5.9 l/min in the mechanically ventilated group and 4.5 +/- 2.8 l/min in the group without mechanical ventilation (P = 0.01). Minute ventilation gradually declined to 5.8 +/- 1.4 l/min and 1.7 +/- 1.6 l/min, respectively, during the last minute of chest compression (P < 0.0001). After 10 min of chest compression, mean arterial pH was significantly more acidemic in the group without mechanical ventilation (7.16 +/- 0.13 compared with 7.30 +/- 0.07 units) and PCO2 was higher (62 +/- 19 compared with 35 +/- 9 mmHg). Mixed venous PCO2 was also higher (76 +/- 15 compared with 61 +/- 8 mmHg).ConclusionStandard chest compression alone produced measurable tidal volume and minute ventilation. However, after 10 min of chest compression following 6 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, it failed to sustain pulmonary gas exchange as indicated by significantly greater arterial and mixed venous hypercarbic acidosis when compared with a group receiving mechanical ventilation.

16 keywords...

hide…