• Céline Broucqsault-Dédrie, Julien De Jonckheere, Mathieu Jeanne, and Saad Nseir.
• Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Victor Provo, 35 rue de Barbieux - CS 60359 - 59056 Roubaix Cedex, France.
• Plos One. 2016 Jan 1;11(1):e0147720.

IntroductionThe analgesia nociception index (ANI) assesses the relative parasympathetic tone as a surrogate for antinociception/nociception balance in sedated patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain in deeply sedated critically ill patients.MethodsThis prospective observational study was performed in two medical ICUs. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and deep sedation were eligible. In all patients, heart rate and ANI were continuously recorded using the Physiodoloris® device during 5 minutes at rest (T1), during a painful stimulus (T2), and during 5 minutes after the end of the painful stimulus (T3). The chosen painful stimulus was patient turning for washstand. Pain was evaluated at T2, using the behavioral pain scale (BPS). The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain. Secondary objectives included the impact of norepinephrine on the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain, and the correlation between ANI and BPS.ResultsForty-one patients were included. ANI was significantly lower at T2 (Med (IQR) 69(55-78)) compared with T1 (85(67-96), p<0.0001), or T3 (81(63-89), p<0.0001). Similar results were found in the subgroups of patients with (n = 21) or without (n = 20) norepinephrine. ANI values were significantly higher in patients with norepinephrine compared with those without norepinephrine at T1, and T2. No significant correlation was found between ANI and BPS at T2.ConclusionsANI is effective in detecting pain in deeply sedated critically ill patients, including those patients treated with norepinephrine. No significant correlation was found between ANI and BPS.

6 keywords...

hide…