• M Frediani, G Blanchini, M Capanna, L Casini, M Costa, S Uggeri, M Meini, and P Pacini.
• II UO di Anestesia e Rianimazione, USL N 6 di Livorno.
• Minerva Anestesiol. 1996 Mar 1;62(3):65-71.

AbstractWe carried out a perspective study in order to assess the ease of insertion, the type and the incidence of perioperative complications connected with the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We examined 300 consecutive patients, M/F 261/39, average age 4.2 yrs. (range 0.1-16), ASA I-II, who underwent surgical operations of short or average length not involving the pleural, the oropharyngeal or the peritoneum cavity. The choice about anesthesia was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. In 27 cases the position of the LM was controlled through a flexible fiberoptics. In 269 patients (89.6%) the LMA was correctly positioned during the first attempt. In 27 patients (9%), 2 or more attempts were necessary, and in 4 patients (1.4%) it was not possible to set the LMA. No differences of statistical significance were noticed between the different size of LMA, with regards to the facility of insertion. The control through fiberoptics showed a correct position, from an anatomical point of view, in 11 patients (41%), whereas in 13 patients (48%) some signs of partial obstruction were noticed (epiglottis interposing between the opening of LMA and larynx) and in 3 patients (11%) vocal cords are not visible. The following complications took place: laryngeal spasm on induction (2.3%), cough or movements on positioning (2.3%), hypoxia (4.3%), obstruction (1%), laryngeal spasm on awakening (1.7%), trauma (5%) and vomiting (0.3%). No connections were found between the size of LMA and total complications. Nevertheless, cough or movement during positioning and laryngeal spasm on awakening were significantly more frequent with LMA n. 3. In our experience, the LMA proved to be effectual and safe in the control of the airway during elective operations in pediatric surgery.

11 keywords...

hide…