-
- R S Cathcart and H B Gregorie.
- Am Surg. 1984 Sep 1;50(9):482-4.
AbstractRetrospective analysis failed to demonstrate that drainage in routine cholecystectomy was associated with the reported incidence of wound complications. The overall complication rate was increased in those patients in whom drains were used. This is believed to be due to the patient selection rather than the use of drains in that the most difficult operative cases received drains. Those patients who did not have drainage did not experience related problems, but drains may diagnose and treat the occasional bile leak. Incidental appendectomy increased the incidence of wound infection.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.