• Klin Monbl Augenheilkd · Aug 2013

    [Characteristics of traumatic versus spontaneous wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty].

    • D Pahor.
    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Slovenia. d.pahor@sb-mb.si
    • Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Aug 1;230(8):808-13.

    Background And PurposeAfter penetrating keratoplasty (PK) patients remain at risk for wound dehiscence at the graft-host junction even years after surgery. The aim of our study was, firstly, to assess the site-specific characteristics between traumatic and spontaneous wound dehiscence at the graft-host junction and, secondly, to determine the incidence of traumatic and spontaneous wound dehiscence.MethodsThe medical records of all 243 patients who underwent a penetrating keratoplasty from 1 March 1996 to 1 March 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. During a 16-year period 9 eyes showed signs of open wound dehiscence after blunt ocular trauma and 7 eyes spontaneously after suture removal.ResultsOver the 16-year period, the incidence of traumatic wound dehiscence was 3.7 % (9 of patients), whereas the incidence of spontaneous wound dehiscence after suture removal was 2.9 % (7 of 243 patients). In traumatic cases the graft dehiscence occurred in 88.9 % (8 of 9 patients) in the nasal part, predominantly in the inferior nasal part. In one case (11.1 %), only the temporal part was affected. The average extent of wound dehiscence for traumatic cases was 96° of the total wound circumference in the nasal part, and only 30° of the circumference in the temporal part. Spontaneous dehiscence after suture removal mainly occurred at temporal site in 71.4 % (5 of 7 eyes), mostly temporal inferior. Only in one case was the nasal part affected (14.3 %). The average extent of wound dehiscence in spontaneous cases was 54° of the total circumference in the temporal part and 21° in the nasal part. The total average extent of dehiscence was significantly larger in traumatic cases, 126° (one third) for traumatic and 75° (one fifth) of the wound circumference for spontaneous cases. All of the re-sutured grafts retained clarity, except for 3 eyes among the traumatic cases.ConclusionThe difference between both groups was significant regarding the localisation, the extent and the clarity of the re-sutured grafts. The nasal inferior part was the most affected area in traumatic cases probably as a result of indirect, contrecoup injuries, and the temporal part in spontaneous wound dehiscence probably due to direct minor forces.Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…