• J Nippon Med Sch · Jun 2007

    The clinical usefulness of procalcitonin measurement for assessing the severity of bacterial infection in critically ill patients requiring corticosteroid therapy.

    • Shigeki Kushimoto, Yasushi Shibata, Yuichi Koido, Makoto Kawai, Hiroyuki Yokota, and Yasuhiro Yamamoto.
    • Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan. kussie@nms.ac.jp
    • J Nippon Med Sch. 2007 Jun 1;74(3):236-40.

    UnlabelledMarkers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count, have, because of their low specificity, proven far from ideal in identifying patients with sepsis. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been shown to be a useful marker for differentiating patients with bacterial infection from other acute inflammatory conditions. Corticosteroid therapy has been demonstrated to be effective for treating patients with septic shock, late-phase acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or functional adrenal insufficiency, and the use of corticosteroid in critical illness has recently increased. It is also well established that corticosteroid modulate inflammatory variables in acute inflammatory conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of PCT measurement for assessing the severity of bacterial infection in patients requiring corticosteroid therapy.Materials And MethodsSix patients with confirmed bacterial infectious diseases or suspected infectious diseases and requiring corticosteroid therapy were enrolled in the study. Levels of PCT and CRP were measured. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score were calculated to evaluate the severity of sepsis.Results1) There was no significant correlation between the serum concentration of PCT and the plasma level of CRP in patients requiring corticosteroid therapy. 2) The PCT concentration was significantly correlated with the SOFA score (R(2)=0.467, p<0.0001) and the APACHE II score (R(2)=0.308, p=0.0003). However, no significant correlations was found between the CRP concentration and the SOFA score (R(2)=0.054, p=0.15) or the APACHE II score (R(2)=0.043, p=0.20). 3) Data sets were divided into two groups: septic shock and non-septic shock. No significant differences were present in CRP levels between the groups. However, significant differences were apparent in PCT concentrations (p<0.001).ConclusionPCT can be a more sensitive and useful marker than CRP for evaluating the severity and progression of sepsis in patients requiring corticosteroid therapy. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in larger groups of patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.