• Am. J. Surg. · Dec 2013

    Comparative Study

    Determination of independent predictive factors for anastomotic leak: analysis of 682 intestinal anastomoses.

    • Bryan C Morse, Joshua P Simpson, Yonge R Jones, Brent L Johnson, Brianna M Knott, and Jennifer A Kotrady.
    • Academic Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Greenville Memorial Hospital, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, 3rd Floor, 701 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605, USA. Electronic address: bcmorse@ghs.org.
    • Am. J. Surg. 2013 Dec 1;206(6):950-5; discussion 955-6.

    BackgroundThe objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with intestinal anastomotic leakage in order to practically assist in surgical decision making.MethodsA retrospective review of an academic surgery database was performed over 5 years to identify patients who had intestinal (small bowel and colon) anastomoses to determine independent predictors of anastomotic leakage.ResultsOver the study period, 682 patients were identified with intestinal anastomoses; the overall leak rate was 5.6% (38/682). In bivariate analysis, 9 factors were associated with anastomotic leaks. Of these, 3 were found to be independent predictors of anastomotic leakage using a logistic regression model: anastomotic tension (odds ratio [OR] = 10.1, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.3 to 76.9), use of drains (OR = 8.9, 95% CI 4.3 to 18.4), and perioperative blood transfusion (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 12.3).ConclusionsThe recognition of factors associated with anastomotic leakage after intestinal operations can assist surgeons in mitigating these risks in the perioperative period and guide intraoperative decisions.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…