• Pediatric emergency care · Apr 1994

    Comparative Study

    The utility of autopsies in a pediatric emergency department.

    • S R Whitehouse, N Kissoon, N Singh, and D Warren.
    • Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
    • Pediatr Emerg Care. 1994 Apr 1;10(2):72-5.

    AbstractThe role of the autopsy in verifying clinical diagnosis and as a quality assurance tool in pediatric emergency medicine has not been studied. We reviewed the charts of all children who died soon after arriving at to the pediatric emergency department between October 1985 and December 1989. Opinions as to clinical diagnoses and cause of death were obtained by presenting a summary of patient data, in a blinded fashion, to three emergency pediatricians. Clinical diagnoses were then compared with autopsy diagnoses using the Class Error System. Major diagnostic errors (Class I, Class II) were examined to determine if the autopsy was more useful in any particular patient group. There were 69 children: 36 (52%) were female, and 30 (43%) were infants. Autopsies were performed on 52 (75%) patients. Autopsy diagnoses were categorized as follows: sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) 14 (27%); underlying disease 15 (29%); trauma 13 (25%); sepsis 8 (16%); and aspiration 2 (4%). No errors were made in 67% of cases. The autopsy confirmed the major clinical diagnosis in 85% of patients. There were no Class I errors. Class II error rate was 15%. Most Class II errors occurred in patients between one and five years of ate (57%), and in patients who had sepsis or underlying disease (95%). Our data show that autopsy is useful in determining the cause of death and may be useful for education and quality assurance in pediatric emergency medicine.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.