• J-T Kim, M-S Park, T-S Nam, S-M Choi, B-C Kim, M-K Kim, and K-H Cho.
• Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. alldelight2@jnu.ac.kr
• Eur. J. Neurol. 2011 Jul 1;18(7):988-94.

Background And PurposeClinical and radiological features of patients with unclear-onset stroke do not differ significantly from those with known-onset stroke. There is a lack of evidence for the safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in patients with unclear-onset stroke. We sought to provide supportive data on the safety and efficiency of thrombolysis in patients with unclear-onset stroke.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with unclear-onset stroke (<3 h of first found abnormal time) from our stroke registry. We performed following protocols for thrombolysis in patients with unclear-onset stroke; initial conventional CT-based intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), repeat MRI during IVT, and then decision to maintain IVT or to perform combined intra-arterial thrombolysis. In addition, we compared clinical outcomes and safety between thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed patients.ResultsA total of 78 patients with unclear-onset stroke were included. Twenty-nine patients underwent thrombolysis. Thrombolysis (OR, 6.842; 95% CI, 1.950-24.004; P = 0.003) and baseline NIHSS (OR, 0.769; 95% CI, 0.645-0.917; P = 0.003) were associated with favorable outcomes at 3 months in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The frequency of hemorrhagic transformation and symptomatic ICH was not significantly different between the thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed patients (34.4% vs. 40.7% and 10.3% vs. 8.2%, respectively).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that thrombolysis in unclear-onset stroke could be independently associated with favorable outcomes at 3 months and that thrombolysis based on repeat imaging appears to be safely applied to patients with unclear-onset stroke.© 2011 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2011 EFNS.

17 keywords...

hide…