• Johannes Hadem, Penelope Stiefel, Matthias J Bahr, Hans L Tillmann, Kinan Rifai, Jürgen Klempnauer, Heiner Wedemeyer, Michael P Manns, and Andrea S Schneider.
• Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. hadem.johannes@mh.hannover.de
• Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008 Mar 1;6(3):339-45.

Background & AimsAmong the potentially helpful indicators of poor prognosis in acute liver failure (ALF) are etiology, encephalopathy grade, blood lactate, and King's College Criteria (KCC). The accuracy of these parameters in predicting transplantation or death shows significant variation in different countries.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with ALF treated at our institution between 1996 and 2005. Baseline parameters, simplified acute physiology score III (SAPS-III), KCC, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and a novel score of bilirubin, lactate, and etiology (BiLE score) were compared between transplant-free survivors and patients who required liver transplantation or died, by using multivariate linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC).ResultsThe most common causes of ALF were indeterminate liver failure (21%), acute hepatitis B (18%), acetaminophen ingestion (16%), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (9%). Transplantation-free survival was 38%, 44% of patients underwent liver transplantation, and 18% died without transplantation. Eight-week survival was 77%. The BiLE score was the best predictor of death or need of transplantation, with 79% sensitivity and 84% specificity. ROC analysis revealed a better performance of BiLE score when compared with bilirubin, lactate, MELD score, and SAPS-III (area under the curve: 0.87 +/- 0.04, 0.73 +/- 0.51, 0.73 +/- 0.52, 0.71 +/- 0.05, and 0.68 +/- 0.59, respectively).ConclusionsThe simple, combined BiLE score emerged as the best predictor of poor outcome in our patient cohort and should be prospectively evaluated in other populations.

39 keywords...

hide…