• R Shesser, M Smith, S Adams, R Walls, and M Paxton.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Aug 1;15(8):911-5.

AbstractHalf the patients discharged home from our emergency department with the diagnoses of acute infection, cervicolumbar strain, bronchospasm, allergic reaction, headache, syncope, vaginal hemorrhage, and undiagnosed chest/abdominal pain were randomly assigned to receive a follow-up telephone call two to three days after their visit. Patients in the follow-up call group were telephoned by an ED nurse who questioned them about changes in their clinical status and clarified the aftercare and referral instructions received during the ED visit. Seven days after the visit, a questionnaire that rated patient satisfaction about six aspects of the ED visit was sent to those patients who had been contacted successfully (study group), and to a diagnosis-matched group of patients (control) who did not receive a follow-up call. A nurse was able to reach 144 of the 297 patients assigned to the study group. Significant referral and aftercare interventions were made in 53 (37%) cases including three patients who were instructed to return to the ED. Questionnaires were returned by 83 of 144 (49%) of the study group and by 94 of 262 (35%) of the control group. Male study group patients consistently rated five of six aspects of their visit higher than did the male controls. No difference was observed in questionnaire ratings between the female study and control groups. We conclude that male patients reached by a follow-up telephone call have a more positive perception of their ED visit. A follow-up call also can be useful for reinforcing aftercare instructions, follow-up referrals, and problem-patient identification.

18 keywords...

hide…